Advertising revenue keep this site going. We do not actively endorse ads served to us.
DYOR. Please use your due diligence while on this site.
We also do not get information from our visitors.
cryptocurrency September 13, 2018

September 13, 2018 9:57 PM

Advertisements

ChainSafe and folks from Parity Technologies are advocating for a new proof of authority testnet that would be easier to use across clients. The algorithm chosen to back it may prove contentious.

On September 13, Afri Schoedon of Parity Technologies posted a call for participation to create a more universal testnet. The idea seems to have arisen at the recent ETHBerlin hackathon where Schoedon worked alongside members of the ChainSafe team. In his proposal, he notes that the existing testnets do not adequately support all clients and aren’t “robust enough to guarantee consistent availability and high reliability.”

He proposes the community come together to build Görli, a public Ethereum test network.

Schoedon’s preferred specifications are that clients choose a proof-of-authority (PoA) engine, such as Aura or Clique, and implement it. As it stands, Parity and Geth already use PoA testnets for efficiency’s sake. The existing proof-of-work testnet, Ropsten, is technically compatible with both Parity and Geth, but has had reliability issues. PoA chains do not require as much participation or hash power (or any hash power at all, for that matter), making them the more reliable choice.

At the moment, Parity and Geth use different testnets with different PoA algorithms. However, if the two can agree to one algorithm and implement it, then the community could “bootstrap a new Görli proof-of-authority testnet based on the available implementations that mimics main network conditions.”

In accordance to the protocol for Ethereum development, progress on Görli would begin with the creation of an Ethereum improvement proposal to specify the PoA engine clients should implement to then build the testnet around. Regardless of which is chosen, clients hoping to use the Görli testnet would need to implement it.

Schoedon links to an EIP in development that uses Aura, likely because Aura is a consensus algorithm pioneered by Parity and used to power the Kovan testnet. Geth, the other major Ethereum client, uses Clique for its Rinkeby testnet. Schoedon is careful to specify that this is not a political choice, though there seems to be some tension around this statement on Twitter.

ChainSafe co-founder and CEO Aidan Hyman writes in a Medium post that his team is working on implementing Aura, Parity’s PoA algorithm, in Geth. Hyman explains that they’re using Geth instead of Parity because they happen to be more familiar with Go, the language Geth is written in, than Rust, the language Parity is written in. Hyman does state, however, that “the Görli team” also plans to implement Clique in Rust, just less immediately. In an email to ETHNEWS, Hyman clarified that folks from ChainSafe would be involved in the Clique-Rust implementation, but that development is also open to anyone willing and able to participate.

Political or not, at this very early stage there seems to be more work to bring Geth over to Parity’s algorithm than the other way around. Which engine ends up winning out (if indeed either does) will largely depend on who ends up contributing to the development process. However, once the clients can agree on a consensus algorithm and any further necessary client specifications, Hyman and Schoeden seem to suggest that building the testnet itself would be fairly straightforward.

One notable difference between ChainSafe’s and Schoedon’s framing of this project is that Schoedon emphasizes this as a more universal testnet, open to all clients, whereas ChainSafe only focuses on Geth and Parity. However, in an follow-up email, Hyman clarified that although they are only focusing on these two clients at the moment, ChainSafe also intends that Görli be usable by all clients. Though, as is the case with any decentralized project, this is dependent on developer participation.


Edited September 13, 2018: In an earlier version of this article, we said that PoA requires less hash power than PoW, which is technically true. However, it is also true that PoA requires no hash power. We edited the article to reflect this fact. Additionally, Hyman followed up with ETHNews in an email to clarify that ChainSafe is in fact on the same page with Schoedon in regards to making this testnet universal to all clients.

Alison is an editor and occasional writer for ETHNews. She has a master’s in English from the University of Wyoming. She lives in Reno with her pooch and a cat she half likes. Her favorite things to do include binge listening to podcasts, getting her chuckles via dog memes, and spending as much time outside as possible.

ETHNews is committed to its Editorial Policy

Advertisements

Like what you read? Follow us on Twitter @ETHNews_ to receive the latest Görli, EIP or other Ethereum ecosystem news.

Source: ETHNews

English简体中文日本語한국어DeutschEspañolPortuguêsFrançaisРусскийไทยNederlands